Sutureless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: Surgical and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve stenosis is the most common adult valve disease in industrialized countries. The aging population and the increase in comorbidities urge the development of safer alternatives to the current surgical treatment. Sutureless bioprosthesis has shown promising results, especially in complex procedures and in patients requiring concomitant surgeries. OBJECTIVES: Assess the clinical and hemodynamic performance, safety, and durability of the Perceval® prosthetic valve. METHODS: This single-center retrospective longitudinal cohort study collected data from all adult patients with aortic valve disease who underwent aortic valve replacement with a Perceval® prosthetic valve between February 2015 and October 2020. Of the 196 patients included (mean age 77.20 ± 5.08 years; 45.4% female; mean EuroSCORE II 2.91 ± 2.20%), the majority had aortic stenosis. RESULTS: Overall mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 33.31 ± 14.09 min and 45.55 ± 19.04 min, respectively. Mean intensive care unit and hospital stay were 3.32 ± 3.24 days and 7.70 ± 5.82 days, respectively. Procedural success was 98.99%, as two explants occurred. Four valves were reimplanted due to intraoperative misplacement. Mean transvalvular gradients were 7.82 ± 3.62 mmHg. Pacemaker implantation occurred in 12.8% of patients, new-onset atrial fibrillation in 21.9% and renal replacement support was necessary for 3.1%. Early mortality was 2.0%. We report no structural valve deterioration, strokes, or endocarditis, and one successfully treated valve thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the excellent clinical and hemodynamic performance and safety of a truly sutureless aortic valve, up to a 5-year follow-up. These results were consistent in isolated and concomitant interventions, solidifying this device as a viable option for the treatment of isolated aortic valve disease.

[Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the Medical Curricula in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Analysis].

INTRODUCTION: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has gained relevance as a method of prevention for HIV in certain people and settings. Following the publication of the guideline on PrEP prescribing in Portugal, we aimed to assess the knowledge of Portuguese Medical Students about PrEP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was sent to Medical students of Portuguese Medical Schools. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the results and an analytic cross-sectional study to identify factors associated with "knowing about PrEP", "having had one class about PrEP" and "identifying eligible groups correctly". RESULTS: Of the 796 students that responded to the survey, 64.6% were aware of what PrEP is. Of these, 34.44% acquired this knowledge during their training. Out of the total amount of respondents, 4.77% could identify correctly and completely the eligible groups for PrEP. As the training years went by, the probability of being aware of PrEP, having had one class about PrEP, and identifying the eligible groups correctly, increased. Of the sixth-year students, 43.48% had had one class about PrEP and among the students that were aware of PrEP, 28% identified what the eligible groups were. After adjusting for the school year, we found differences between Medical Schools regarding the outcomes. The association between the different ways of learning about PrEP and the ability to correctly identify eligible groups for PrEP was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The differences between Medical Schools could be harmonized through changes in the medical curricula that would allow this topic to be addressed more often.

Introdução: A profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) ganhou relevância como método de prevenção do VIH em determinados indivíduos e contextos. Após a entrada em vigor das normas para prescrição em Portugal, pretendemos aferir o conhecimento em relação à PrEP entre os estudantes de Medicina em Portugal.Material e Métodos: Foi enviado um questionário online aos estudantes de Medicina das escolas médicas portuguesas. Foi feita uma análise descritiva dos resultados e um estudo transversal analítico para identificar fatores associados a "conhecer a PrEP", "ter tido uma aula de PrEP", e "identificar grupos elegíveis corretamente".Resultados: Dos 796 estudantes que responderam, 64,6% sabiam o que era a PrEP. Destes, 34,44% obteve conhecimento sobre a mesma durante a sua formação. Entre os respondentes, 4,77% identificaram correta e completamente os grupos elegíveis. Com o avançar do ano letivo, a probabilidade de conhecer a PrEP, ter tido uma aula de PrEP e identificar os grupos corretamente aumentava. No sexto ano, 43,48% tinham tido uma aula sobre PrEP e entre os que conheciam a PrEP, 28% identificaram os grupos elegíveis. Existem diferenças entre as escolas médicas após ajustamento para o ano letivo em relação aos resultados obtidos. A forma como se tomou conhecimento da PrEP não alterou de forma estatisticamente significativa a capacidade de identificar corretamente grupos elegíveisConclusão: As diferenças entre as escolas médicas poderão ser harmonizadas. Esta temática poderá ser reforçada nos respetivos currículos.